Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Zak Nelson's avatar

Is anyone actually reviewing and revising your AI slop? I’ve been reading for weeks and, as a professional AI consultant, am appalled at how poorly edited The Gap is.

The article I saw in my inbox this morning was no different: a plausible, interesting premise that dissolves into nonsensical or hard-to-parse language framed as fortune cookie wisdom. For example:

“And whoever is waiting on your maybe? A clear no wounds less than silence. The slow fade is the cruelest way to be excluded. Your unannounced no is not kindness. It’s the longest possible route to the same news.”

This kind of meaningless crap is what LLMs spit out when the prompt is poorly constructed and the output poorly edited.

And this isn’t a lifestyle blog; this is mental health advice.

I’m unsubscribing, and unless you address this, I’ll start incorporating this into my workshops and social posts, using The Gap as an example of a good idea executed poorly and unethically.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?